NSFW filter is too strong in Bonkers
G
Guy
I am getting loads of Bonkers images rejected for NSFW content.
The last one was "Photo from behind of barefoot bride and groom running on Lanikai Beach, backs to camera, turquoise ocean waves ahead, white sand, mountain peaks of Mokulua Islands in distance, morning light".
Nothing about that is NSFW. I am guessing it's the word "barefoot"?
Christoph Kny
Issue persists. With "anime" style images generated, same prompt with "comic" style is NSFW flagged.
Couldn't you implement a "report incorrect flag" feature, with a form that go to Merlin Support to improve this filter!?
Christoph Kny
The prompt "art museum with visitors" was marked as NSFW !?
S
Siddhartha
Christoph Kny: We are able to generate with just that prompt. Can you give your settings more clearly?
Christoph Kny
Hi Siddhartha, I tried to reproduce it today, but wasn't able. Maybe a "temporarily" issue. If this happens again, I will log my exact settings and details. What is the best way to reach out to you, with all this information, so that you can investigate this?
S
Siddhartha
Christoph Kny Please just reach out on my email. siddhartha@getmerlin.in
G
Guy
Kunal Verma endu This is really a problem. Just did "winter engagement photo" - flagged for NSFW.
Flux 1.1 Pro, New Bonkers.
It's made New Bonkers unusable for me.
Old Bonkers seems to work.
Kunal Verma
Guy We are actively addressing this issue. Currently, there are two levels of filtering in place: one managed by us and the other by our provider. The prompts you encountered issues with were likely blocked by the provider's filter. We are exploring the option of switching to a different provider but need to carefully evaluate several factors before making a decision. We appreciate your patience and understanding. Thank you!
G
Guy
Kunal Verma Thanks for that. That is odd, though, as why does the same model (Flux Pro 1.1) work on Old Bonkers? It's only New Bonkers I seem to have a problem with.
Or is New Bonkers under a different provider?
Kunal Verma
Guy they both are under same provider, I think provider's filter is not consistent enough, all your given prompts worked for me in single attempt on new Bonkers.
Personally, I would recommend using the Recraft V3 model, as it is currently the highest-rated image model (in every aspect of generation whether it is text, prompt adherence, better understanding) and should not cause this issue. However, I'm unsure about your specific use cases.
G
Guy
Kunal Verma Unfortunately, it's nowhere near as good as Flux Pro 1.1 for people. People generated by Recraft are very deformed. Particularly faces.
Kunal Verma
Guy Yeah people's face other than in closeups are deformed in Recraft.
No issues, we will push change for configurations or providers asap to solve this issue.
G
Guy
Kunal Verma Thanks! Maybe you can let the provider know.
Kunal Verma
Guy We have done some configuration changes that should fix this issue. Please let us know if this happens again.
Kunal Verma
Guy can you tell the models you have tried with and are you using new interface of Bonkers or legacy (https://getmerlin.in/bonkers) one?
G
Guy
Kunal Verma New interface, Flux Pro 1.1.
G
Guy
Not even this "Photo of elopement wedding at Byodo-In Temple, red architecture ahead, koi ponds, misty Ko'olau Mountains, Japanese garden elements, in wedding attire".
Nothing in that is NSFW. Kunal Verma Siddhartha
G
Guy
Another: "Photo from behind of sunset silhouette of embracing couple on Sunset Beach, orange and purple sky ahead, palm trees, gentle waves, dark figures against colorful backdrop".
"Embracing"?
This filter really needs turning down!
G
Guy
Another: "Photo from behind of couple sharing first kiss under waterfall in Ko'olau Mountains, backs visible, tropical flowers, mist, ethereal lighting, surrounded by emerald vegetation".
"Kissing" is NSFW?